Diagnosis of hyperprolactinemia in women: A Position Statement from the Brazilian Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Associations (Febrasgo) and the Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism (SBEM).

Hyperprolactinemia is a frequent cause of menstrual irregularity, galactorrhea, hypogonadism, and infertility. The most common etiologies of hyperprolactinemia can be classified as physiological, pharmacological, and pathological. Among pathological conditions, it is essential to distinguish prolactinomas from other tumors and pituitary lesions presenting with hyperprolactinemia due to pituitary stalk disconnection. Proper investigation considering clinical data, laboratory tests, and, if necessary, imaging evaluation, is important to identify the correctcause of hyperprolactinemia and manage the patient properly. This position statement by the Brazilian Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Associations (Febrasgo) and Brazilian Societyof Endocrinology and Metabolism (SBEM) addresses the recommendations for measurement of serum prolactin levels and the investigations of symptomatic and asymptomatic hyperprolactinemia and medication-induced hyperprolactinemia in women.

Macroprolactin over time: Is there any point in rechecking it in people with a persistently elevated serum prolactin?

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: Macroprolactinemia may influence the interpretation of serum prolactin levels-a recognised phenomenon since 1981. The degree of macroprolactinaemia over time is less well described. We determined how macroprolactin status (based on polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation) varied by analysing serial measurements in hyperprolactinaemic individuals over a period of 9 years. PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Results from 1810 individuals were included. All serum total prolactin results (measured using Roche Cobas 8000 analyser) were extracted from the laboratory information system for the period 1 January 2012 to 1 April 2021, along with relevant patient demographic/test data. Samples with a macroprolactin screening test performed (on samples with prolactin > 700 miu/L) were included in the main analysis. RESULTS: During the study period, 2782 macroprolactin checks were performed (12.5% of all prolactin tests) in 1810 individuals (599 males/2183 females, median-age: 35, interquartile range: 25-47, range: 16-93 years). Multiple macroprolactin checks were carried out on 465 patients (1437 measurements) with 94 patients (141 measurements) screening positive (<60% recovery). Only 19 patients (18 female) had at least one result above and one below the 60% screening cut-off, with 10 of these patients having results close to the 60% cut-off; in 9 patients, results were clearly different between repeat samples. In seven cases, the adjusted monomeric prolactin showed a potentially clinically significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, only 19/465 patients appeared to change macroprolactin status based on a 60% PEG recovery cut-off. The majority of these 19 patients were on antipsychotic/antidepressant medication(s) or had a prolactinoma; in only 7 did monomeric prolactin change significantly. This suggests that once macroprolactin status has been determined, clinical decision making is rarely affected by repeating it.

Acute retinal pigment epitheliitis during treatment of hyperprolactinaemia.

BACKGROUND: Acute retinal pigment epitheliitis (ARPE) is a rare, idiopathic and self-limiting disease. The article aims to present ARPE in a patient using D2 dopamine receptor agonists for the treatment of hyperprolactinemia. CASE PRESENTATION: A 28-year-old female during hyperprolactinaemia treatment suffered from a dyschromatopsia and a central visual field defect in the left eye. She noticed a deterioration of vision and discontinued the cabergoline administration. The woman had not been diagnosed with other chronic conditions and exhibited no symptoms of infection. Upon admission, the patient was subjected to a test for COVID-19, which was negative. The ophthalmological examination revealed a decrease in visual acuity to distance in the left eye, which amounted to 18/20 on the Snellen chart. A central scotoma was noted on the Amsler chart and a loss of pigment epithelium was visible on the fundus of the left eye. Fluorescein angiography showed a discrete window defect in the left one, with no signs of leakage. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans of the maculae revealed a characteristic change in the photoreceptor layer and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) in the fovea in the left eye. The electrophysiological tests revealed decreased function of cells in macular region. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head and orbits demonstrated an asymmetric pituitary gland without chiasm compression and discrete signal enhancement from the left optic nerve. The patient underwent observation during hospitalisation. She reported improved colour vision and a decreased scotoma in the centre of her visual field. In regular outpatient follow-ups, successive improvements in visual acuity, as well as a decreased RPE damage and outer photoreceptor layer loss during an OCT test were observed. CONCLUSIONS: A case of ARPE is reported in a patient taking medications for hyperprolactinemia. The role of dopamine receptor antagonists in the photoreceptor function and causation of ARPE needs further evaluation.

[Overcoming therapy resistance in prolactinomas: from perspectives to real clinical practice].

The main treatment option of prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas is dopamine agonist therapy, which demonstrates prolactin level normalizing and reducing the size of an adenoma in the majority of cases. However, significant amount of patients - about 20% - poorly responds even to high doses of dopamine agonists that is explained by the resistance to therapy. The occurrence of pharmacodynamic characteristics is one of the causes responsible for the development of resistance to typical therapy. Clinical manifestations of persistent hyperprolactinemia are due to following pathological factors: hormonal hypersecretion and the mass-effect of pituitary adenoma. Prevention of irreversible changes is possible only with timely detection of resistance and determination of the optimal personalized treatment algorithm.We report a clinical case of dopamine-agonist resistant microprolactinoma. Patient's health stabilisation, normal level of prolactin and reduction in size of adenoma were achieved due to administration of combined treatment with tamoxifen and dopamine agonists. Hyperprolactinaemia occurring because of prolactin-secreting pituitary adenoma and associated adverse effects are significant problem, decreasing quality of life and demographics in general. This underlines the importance of figuring out causes and identifying predictors of the therapy resistance.The results of the study, illustrated by a clinical example, are presented in the present paper.

Prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas: male-specific differences in pathogenesis, clinical presentation and treatment.

Prolactinomas (PRLomas) constitute approximately half of all pituitary adenomas and approximately one-fifth of them are diagnosed in males. The clinical presentation of PRLomas results from direct prolactin (PRL) action, duration and severity of hyperprolactinemia, and tumor mass effect. Male PRLomas, compared to females, tend to be larger and more invasive, are associated with higher PRL concentration at diagnosis, present higher proliferative potential, are more frequently resistant to standard pharmacotherapy, and thus may require multimodal approach, including surgical resection, radiotherapy, and alternative medical agents. Therefore, the management of PRLomas in men is challenging in many cases. Additionally, hyperprolactinemia is associated with a significant negative impact on men's health, including sexual function and fertility potential, bone health, cardiovascular and metabolic complications, leading to decreased quality of life. In this review, we highlight the differences in pathogenesis, clinical presentation and treatment of PRLomas concerning the male sex.

The utility of rested prolactin sampling in the evaluation of hyperprolactinaemia.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Serum prolactin levels may be elevated by venepuncture stress. We investigated the utility of a rested prolactin sample, obtained through an indwelling venous cannula, in preventing the overdiagnosis of hyperprolactinaemia. METHODS: Patients at our institution undergo serial prolactin sampling, usually over 40 min, when investigating hyperprolactinaemia. We retrospectively reviewed all serial prolactin sampling performed during a 3-year period. Patients with possible medication-induced hyperprolactinaemia and macroprolactin interference were excluded. We assessed the effect of venepuncture-associated stress on hyperprolactinaemia with the main outcome being normalisation of serum prolactin at the end of serial sampling. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients with documented hyperprolactinaemia (range 360-1690 mU/L) were included in the analysis. Prolactin decreased during serial sampling in 73 patients (78%), suggesting a prevalent effect of venepuncture stress. The final prolactin sample was normal in 50 patients (54%), consistent with stress hyperprolactinaemia rather than pathological hyperprolactinaemia. Patients with a referral prolactin result greater than two times the upper reference limit (URL) were less likely (15%) to have a normal prolactin result on serial sampling. Measurement of a single rested prolactin sample from an indwelling cannula showed the same diagnostic utility as serial sampling. CONCLUSION: Serum prolactin results are frequently elevated by the stress of venepuncture. Confirmation of pathological hyperprolactinaemia in a rested sample obtained from an indwelling venous cannula is recommended in patients with mild hyperprolactinaemia, particularly when the referral prolactin is less than two times the URL.

Diagnostic workup of endocrine dysfunction in recurrent pregnancy loss: a cross-sectional study in Northeast China.

Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of abnormal endocrine dysfunction for recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) amongst patients with two versus three or more pregnancy losses. Methods: This cross-sectional study retrospectively collected pre-pregnancy data of 537 women diagnosed with RPL in Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University from 2017 to 2022, including the baseline data of patients and the test results of endocrine factors. Several endocrine dysfunction included in this study were: thyroid dysfunction, obesity, hyperprolactinemia, polycystic ovary syndrome and blood glucose abnormality. Furthermore, vitamin D level were collected to study its relationship with endocrine dysfunction. Finally, we subdivided the patients according to the number of previous pregnancy loss and compared the prevalence of endocrine dysfunction between subgroups. Results: Among 537 RPL patients, 278 (51.8%) patients had abnormal endocrine test results. The highest incidence of endocrine dysfunction was thyroid dysfunction (24.39%, 131/537), followed by hyperprolactinemia (17.34%, 85/490), obesity (10.8%, 58/537), polycystic ovary syndrome (10.50%, 56/533), and abnormal blood glucose (5.29%, 27/510). Only 2.47%(13/527) of patients have vitamin D level that reach the standard. After subdividing the population according to the number of pregnancy loss, we did not find that the incidence of endocrine dysfunction (P=0.813), thyroid dysfunction (P=0.905), hyperprolactinemia (P=0.265), polycystic ovary syndrome (P=0.638), blood glucose abnormality (P=0.616) and vitamin D deficiency (P=0.908) were different among patients with two versus three or more pregnancy losses. However, obesity (P=0.003) was found more frequently observed in patients with more times of pregnancy loss. Conclusion: The prevalence of endocrine dysfunction in RPL population is high. There is no difference in the prevalence of endocrine dysfunction, except for obesity, among patients with two or more pregnancy losses, which may suggest investigations of endocrine dysfunction when patients have two pregnancy losses.

[Modern concepts of genetic and immunohistochemical features of prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas].

Prolactinomas are the most common secreting adenomas of the pituitary. In 20% of cases resistance to dopamine-agonists treatment is observed. Medical therapy resistance causes progression of pathological symptoms of hyperprolactinemia and negative topographic and anatomical changes of prolactinoma. The causes of ineffectiveness of dopamine agonists therapy are not fully understood as well as approaches to managing patients require clarification. Current concepts of resistance are based on the data obtained as a result of surgery or after a period of long-term ineffective therapy. Thus, it is very important to find methods of assessing the sensitivity of prolactin-secreting adenomas to drug therapy before surgical treatment. Genetic and immunohistochemical studies find special place among these methods, making it possible to predict adenoma's response to drug therapy at early diagnostic stage. Obtained results will allow us to form personalized algorithm for managing patients.

GIANT PROLACTINOMA. A CASE REPORT.

AIM: Prolactinoma is a pituitary adenoma that secretes prolactin. Approximately 40% of all pituitary adenomas are prolactinomas. According to size, they are divided into micro, macro and giant prolactinomas. In women, prolactinomas cause irregularities of the menstrual cycle such as amenorrhea, galactorrhea, weight gain, in both sexes they cause sterility, hypogonadism, decreased libido and depression. In macroadenomas, symptoms due to the compression of the surrounding structures are also manifested, such as headache, vomiting, lower chiasmatic syndrome and ophthalmoplegia. Loss of the visual field due to compression of the optic chiasm is caused by a tumor larger than 10-15 mm with suprasellar spreading, which breaks through the diaphragma sellae. Giant prolactinomas are larger than 40 mm and make up 1-5% of all prolactinomas. CASE REPORT: In this article I present the case of a 38-year-old woman from Ukraine with advanced chiasmatic syndrome caused by a giant prolactinoma. The tumor is infiltrating the left cavernous sinus, causing left-sided amaurosis and right-sided temporal hemianopsia. CONCLUSION: Inferior chiasmatic syndrome is characterized by bitemporal hemianopsia, a deterioration of visual acuity, bilateral bow-tie descendent atrophy of the optic nerve disc, and hemianopic rigidity of the pupils. Macroprolactinomas occur more frequently in men than in women. The diagnosis is often delayed, probably because the symptoms of hyperprolactinemia are less obvious in men, while women tend to present earlier due to menstrual cycle irregularities. Prolactinomas usually have a good prognosis. Effective medical treatment with dopamine agonists is available. Knowledge of the prolactinoma symptoms could help the diagnosis of compressive lesions of the optic chiasm.

Editorial: A Better Perspective on Antipsychotic-Related Hyperprolactinemia in Children and Adolescents.

Antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia is common in children and adolescents, but this quotidian presence in our clinics should neither reassure us nor make us complacent. The report by Koch and colleagues1 stands out against the landscape of trials describing the adverse effects of psychotropic medications in youth. It goes beyond the typical examination of adverse effects in most clinical trials. The authors followed children and adolescents aged 4 to 17 years who were dopamine-serotonin receptor antagonist naive (≤1-week exposure) or free, and serially evaluated not only serum prolactin concentrations but medication concentrations and side effects for 12 weeks after participants began aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone. This report provides insights into the temporal course of adverse effects, examines differential tolerability among dopamine-serotonin receptor antagonists, links specific adverse effects-galactorrhea, decreased libido, and erectile dysfunction-with prolactin concentrations in youth, and focuses on the clinical aspects of hyperprolactinemia and related adverse effects in children and adolescents.

Comparison of PEG precipitation and ultrafiltration treatment for serum macroprolactin in Chinese patients with hyperprolactinemia.

BACKGROUND: Macroprolactinemia is a common cause of hyperprolactinemia (HPRL), with an average worldwide incidence of 18.9 %. This study aimed to explore the feasibility of ultrafiltration (UF) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation for macroprolactin screening, as well as the incidence and clinical characteristics of Chinese patients with macroprolactinemia. METHODS: In this study, 94 patients with HPRL and 206 healthy individuals were included. Gel filtration chromatography (GFC), PEG precipitation, and UF were used to screen for macroprolactin, and chemiluminescence was used to determine the prolactin levels. RESULTS: The detected incidence of macroprolactinemia in the patients with HPRL was 7.45% (7/94, GFC) and 5.32% (5/94, PEG precipitation). Patients with macroprolactinemia usually present with atypical clinical symptoms, moderately increased prolactin levels, and negative or microadenoma-positive pituitary images. In addition, the recovery of monomeric prolactin by PEG precipitation and UF was significantly correlated to that of GFC (r PEG = 0.493, P < 0.001; r UF = 0.226, P = 0.014), with a higher correlation coefficient between PEG precipitation and GFC. Furthermore, PEG precipitation had a smaller variation (95% confidence interval [CI]: -35.77% to 18.34%) than UF in monomeric prolactin recovery and substantial diagnostic consistency with GFC (Cohen's kappa coefficient = 0.647). The proportion of monomeric prolactin in patients with HPRL did not change significantly between the two visits within one year (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The incidence of macroprolactinemia in Chinese patients with HPRL is low in the present study. Based on our analysis, we recommend that only patients who are clinically suspected of having macroprolactinemia should be screened using PEG precipitation.

What is the optimal prolactin cutoff for predicting the presence of a pituitary adenoma in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome?

Objective: Hyperprolactinemia (HPRL) and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) are common causes of infertility in women of reproductive age. A pituitary adenoma (PA) is the most common type of brain tumor that causes HPRL. In the neurosurgical field, the co-existence of PA and PCOS is not common. However, neurosurgeons often treat patients who are referred from gynecology. Because most of these patients are young and reproductive-aged, it is difficult for a neurosurgeon to come up with a treatment plan alone. In this study, we investigated the prevalence of PAs in PCOS patients, the cutoff prolactin (PRL) level to detect PAs, and the treatment strategy, then assessed the relationship between these diseases via a literature review. Methods: Medical records from November 2009 to March 2020 were reviewed at our institute. A total of 657 PCOS patients were enrolled. Initial prolactin levels were investigated and hyperprolactinemic patients were selected. As a result of sella magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), patients were divided into 2 groups of those with hyperprolactinemia but without PAs (group A) and those with both hyperprolactinemia and PAs (group B), respectively. We then compared and analyzed each group to find the characteristics and statistical differences. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine a cutoff value of the serum PRL level that could detect PAs in hyperprolactinemic PCOS patients. Results: Of 657 patients diagnosed with PCOS, 76 patients had hyperprolactinemia (76/657, 11.6%). Sella MRI was performed in 56 patients, excluding 20 patients for various reasons. Patients in groups A and B numbered 43 and 13, respectively, and the mean serum prolactin level significantly differed between the groups (39.89 ± 41.64 vs. 108.59 ± 60.70 ng/mL, P < 0.001). Based on the ROC curve analysis of the prolactin threshold level for predicting PAs in PCOS patients, the area under the ROC curve was 0.853 (95% confidence interval, 0.733-0.934; P < 0.001), and the sensitivity and specificity were 76.9% and 86.1%, respectively. Ultimately, the cutoff value for prolactin level was 52.9 ng/mL. Conclusion: PCOS and hyperprolactinemia are common causes of infertility in reproductive-age women. PCOS patients with a PRL level of ≥ 52.9 ng/mL may need to undergo sella MRI for detecting PAs. To help ensure a favorable clinical course for these patients, systematic diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up plan should be established. Therefore, a multidisciplinary approach involving both neurosurgery and gynecology is essential.

Hemoglobin decline as a signal for hyperprolactinemia onset prior to prolactinoma diagnosis in hypogonadal men.

BACKGROUND: Men harboring prolactinomas frequently suffer from central hypogonadism with secondary anemia. They present insidious and nonspecific symptoms of hypogonadism, making it difficult to diagnose the disease and determine its duration. The result is a delay in diagnosis, which may have harmful hormonal and metabolic consequences. We hypothesized that a decrease in hemoglobin (HB) levels prior to prolactinoma diagnosis, may signal hyperprolactinemia onset and estimate disease duration. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the prediagnosis temporal trends in HB levels of 70 males with prolactinoma, diagnosed from January 2010 to July 2022. Men without hypogonadism, patients that received testosterone, and those with unrelated anemia were excluded. RESULTS: Sixty-one of seventy men (87%) with prolactinoma presented with hypogonadism, and forty men (57%) had HB levels ≤13.5 g/dL at diagnosis. We identified 25 patients with "informative" HB curves (mean age, 46.1±14.9 years; median prolactin, 952 ng/mL; median follow-up, 14.0 years), demonstrating an obvious prediagnosis HB decrease (greater than 1.0 g/dL), from a prediagnosis baseline HB of 14.4 ± 0.3 to 12.9 ± 0.5 g/dL at diagnosis. The median "low-HB duration" (from the first low HB measurement to hyperprolactinemia diagnosis) was 6.1 years (IQR, 3.3-8.8 years). In symptomatic patients, we identified a correlation between "low-HB duration" and patient-reported sexual dysfunction duration (n = 17, R = 0.502, p = 0.04). The "low-HB duration" was significantly longer than the reported sexual dysfunction duration (7.0 ± 4.5 vs. 2.9 ± 2.5 years, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of men with prolactinomas and hypogonadism, we found a marked decrease in HB levels that preceded prolactinoma diagnosis by a median of 6.1 years, with a mean delay of 4.1 years between HB decrease and hypogonadal symptoms appearance. These results suggest that HB decline prior to prolactinoma diagnosis may serve as a marker for hyperprolactinemia onset in a subset of hypogonadal men and allow a more accurate assessment of disease duration.

Clinical Presentations of Drug-Induced Hyperprolactinaemia: A Literature Review.

Screening for drug-induced hyperprolactinaemia, a condition characterised by higher-than-normal levels of serum prolactin induced by drug treatments, requires a comprehensive understanding of the clinical presentations and long-term complications of the condition. Using two databases, Embase and MEDLINE, we summarised the available evidence on the clinical presentations and long-term complications of drug-induced hyperprolactinaemia. Clinical and observational studies reporting on drug treatments known or suspected to induce hyperprolactinaemia were included. Database searches were limited to the English language; no date or geographic restrictions were applied. Fifty studies were identified for inclusion, comprising a variety of study designs and patient populations. Most data were reported in patients treated with antipsychotics, but symptoms were also described among patients receiving other drugs, such as prokinetic drugs and antidepressants. Notably, the diagnosis of drug-induced hyperprolactinaemia varied across studies since a standard definition of elevated prolactin levels was not consistently applied. Frequent clinical presentations of hyperprolactinaemia were menstrual cycle bleeding, breast or lactation disorders, and sexual dysfunctions, described in 80% (40/50), 74% (37/50), and 42% (21/50) of the included studies, respectively. In the few studies reporting such symptoms, the prevalence of vaginal dryness impacted up to 53% of females, and infertility in both sexes ranged from 15 to 31%. Clinicians should be aware of these symptoms related to drug-induced hyperprolactinaemia when treating patients with drugs that can alter prolactin levels. Future research should explore the long-term complications of drug-induced hyperprolactinaemia and apply accepted thresholds of elevated prolactin levels (i.e., 20 ng/mL for males and 25 ng/mL for females) to diagnose hyperprolactinaemia as a drug-induced adverse event.Trial Registration PROSPERO International Prospective Register Of Systematic Reviews (CRD42021245259).

The Effect of Prolactinoma on Tear Film Function.

Objectives: To compare dry eye parameters in prolactinoma patients and healthy controls and evaluate their correlation with prolactin (PRL) levels and the duration of hyperprolactinemia. Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients with prolactinoma and healthy controls were included in the study. Schirmer, tear break-up time (TBUT), tear osmolarity values, and ocular surface disease index (OSDI) scores were evaluated for each patient. Follow-up time and total duration of hyperprolactinemia were recorded for prolactinoma patients. Results: The study included 39 eyes of 39 patients with prolactinoma and 39 eyes of 39 age- and gender-matched healthy controls. Prolactinoma patients showed lower Schirmer (14.1±8.4 vs. 24.8±8.9 mm; p<0.001) and TBUT values (7.0±3.2 vs. 11.6±2.6 s; p<0.001) and higher OSDI scores (20.6±16.6 vs. 5.8±2.4; p<0.001) compared to the healthy controls. While the mean osmolarity of the prolactinoma patients was 301.6±8.3 mOsm/L, it was 297.7±12.5 mOsm/L for the healthy controls (p=0.07). The duration of hyperprolactinemia in prolactinoma patients showed a negative correlation with Schirmer (r=-0.395; p=0.013) and TBUT values (r=-0.377; p=0.018) and a positive correlation with OSDI scores (r=0.337; p=0.036). Conclusion: Prolactinoma patients had significantly lower Schirmer and TBUT levels and higher OSDI scores compared to the healthy controls, but no significant difference in tear osmolarity. The effect of high PRL levels on tear film function was duration-dependent.

Galactorrhea: Rapid Evidence Review.

Galactorrhea is the production of breast milk that is not the result of physiologic lactation. Milky nipple discharge within one year of pregnancy and the cessation of breastfeeding is usually physiologic. Galactorrhea is more often the result of hyperprolactinemia caused by medication use or pituitary microadenomas, and less often hypothyroidism, chronic renal failure, cirrhosis, pituitary macroadenomas, hypothalamic lesions, or unidentifiable causes. A pregnancy test should be obtained for premenopausal women who present with galactorrhea. In addition to prolactin and thyroid-stimulating hormone levels, renal function should also be assessed. Medications contributing to hyperprolactinemia should be discontinued if possible. Treatment of galactorrhea is not needed if prolactin and thyroid-stimulating hormone levels are normal and the discharge is not troublesome to the patient. Magnetic resonance imaging of the pituitary gland should be performed if the cause of hyperprolactinemia is unclear after a medication review and laboratory evaluation. Cabergoline is the preferred medication for treatment of hyperprolactinemia. Transsphenoidal surgery may be necessary if prolactin levels do not improve and symptoms persist despite high doses of cabergoline and in patients who cannot tolerate dopamine agonist therapy.

HETEROGENEITY OF CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS OF HYPERPROLACTINEMIA (REVIEW AND OWN OBSERVATIONS).

The article is devoted to the features of the clinical picture of hyperprolactinemia, which can be partially determined by both gender and age of patients. Along with the well-known "classic" manifestations of hyperprolactinemiс syndrome, such as clinical signs of hypogonadism and mechanical pressure of the pituitary tumor on adjacent anatomical structures, there are others that are poorly known to a wide range of practicing physicians. Less frequent manifestations of hyperprolactinemia include the development of hypopituitarism, osteoporosis or osteopenia, alopecia. The analysis of literature data is illustrated with clinical examples from our own practice. It is noted that the pronounced heterogeneity of the clinical manifestations of hyperprolactinemia determines the need to develop continuity and consistency between doctors of different specialties for timely diagnosis and adequate treatment of this pathology.

Treatments of psychiatric disorders, hyperprolactinemia and dopamine agonists.

While the prevalence of hyperprolactinemia under antidepressants is very low, its prevalence under antipsychotics, particularly of the first generation, is high. Antipsychotics act by blocking dopamine activity at the level of the dopamine type 2 receptor (D2R). When prolactin levels exceed 80-100 ng/ml, a pituitary adenoma must be ruled out by MRI. Treatment of hyperprolactinemia is necessary only in cases with clinical symptoms of hypogonadism. Three treatment options are possible: switch to a less hyperprolactinemic antipsychotic, sex steroid supplementation or dopamine agonist (which normalizes prolactin levels in only half of cases). Fortunately, psychotic exacerbation due to the opposing effects of antipsychotics and dopamine agonists on the D2R seems very rare. When a patient presents with a macroprolactinoma, particularly with optic chiasm compression, surgery or dopamine agonists may be proposed. The agonists are effective in reducing tumor mass and improving visual defects in the majority of patients but rarely normalize prolactin levels.